Over the past few months, I’ve received a number of inquiries about Acrobat and Office 2010 compatibility. Adobe Acrobat X is the first version of Acrobat to support Microsoft Office 2010. The Acrobat 9 PDF Maker toolbars do not function or appear in Microsoft Office 2010! Didn’t Acrobat 9 ship recently? Why doesn’t Acrobat 9 support Office 2010?
Feb 8, 2016 - I have used MS Office 2010 Excel and Word to print to Adobe Acrobat 9.5 with no issues (on Windows 10) until the upgrade to MS Office 2016.
The timeline below shows that Acrobat 9 shipped two years before Office 2010. • Acrobat 9 shipped in June 2008 • Microsoft Office 2010 shipped in June 2010 • Adobe Acrobat X shipped in November 2010 What does Adobe mean by “support for Office 2010”? Adobe Acrobat X installs toolbars and advanced integration— called PDF Makers— into Office 2010 applications such as Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Outlook. In addition to offering one-click conversion from Office applications, the PDF Makers enable additional functions within Acrobat and Windows Explorer. In fact, Acrobat itself relies on the PDF Makers working correctly for important functions. Can’t users just print to the PDF Print Driver? The Adobe PDF Print driver offers basic PDF creation via the Print command.
Output from the PDF Print Driver is not functionally equivalent to that of the Adobe PDF Makers. What will my organization miss if I do not install the Acrobat X PDF Makers? Here are a few of the key features that will be missed using an earlier version of Acrobat with Office 2010. I used to be able to see a thumbnail image of my pdf file when set as an attachment within my Microsoft Access 2010 Database. Once Acrobat X came out the functionality ceased to where now I can only see the standard PDF icon instead of the thumbnail of the particular PDF document. Will the functionality ever return to see the image again? The newer Acrobat reader versions have forced me to seperately imbed bitmap images for the same effect.
Nov 25, 2011 The app-v deployment kit for Office 2010 doesn't lay down any registry keys for Extended MAPI, which Adobe Reader uses (or any adobe software it seems). Hi, welcome to justanswer. I am Jins here to assist you. One-button PDF file creation in Microsoft Office 2010 and the ability to import comments into Word are available only in Acrobat X for Windows. To create PDF files from Office 2010 applications including Outlook 2010 when using earlier versions of Acrobat, select Adobe PDF as the printer in the Print dialog box. Clear the Acrobat PDFMaker Office COM Addin check box, as follows (Office 2010 screen shot), and then click OK. If you cannot disable the add-in by following these steps, use one of the following methods. Adobe Acrobat Issue: Click-to-Run is a new method by Microsoft to deliver Office 2010 to home users on a broadband connection. If you install Office 2010 using the Click-to-Run method, some add-ins, like PDFMaker, don't work correctly with Office 2010 applications.
Taking away from both the presentability of the database and adding significantly to my file size. I am using Acrobat X with Word 2010. Recently we have encountered a problem with figures in complex documents. Parts of figures are being randomly dropped or scrambled in the PDF.
![Office 2010 and adobe acrobat 10 pro Office 2010 and adobe acrobat 10 pro](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4a/Adobe_Acrobat_DC_2017_running_on_Windows_10.png/267px-Adobe_Acrobat_DC_2017_running_on_Windows_10.png)
About the only surefire way to get a PDF with good figures is to print to PDF, and even this is not 100%, and you lose a lot of valuable features. We have searched the web to see if anyone else is having these problems, to no avail.
This is the only site I have found with people posting anything similar to our problems. Is anyone else experiencing these problems? How have you addressed them? Hi, Rick – I do proofreading for a court reporter who sends me ASCII’s and then I convert to PDF, use iAnnotate on my iPad to edit, and then return to her. (iPad’s PDF converter app doesn’t accurately convert, either.) I followed your instructions from your blog from ’06 “Converting Depo Transcripts to PDF,” but my settings on Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro are not the same; hence, I still cannot get an accurate translation. I use Windows 7 Enterprise, Version 6.1 Can you help me “tweak” Adobe or offer any suggestions as to how I can get these transcripts accurately translated?
I have a problem with encapsulated postscript graphics being very badly rendered by the Adobe PDF Maker in Word 2010, whereas they come out perfectly if I simply print to the PDF Print Driver. The problem with the print driver of course is that it does not provide navigational links such as cross-references, table of contents etc. My documents require both high quality graphics and navigational links. To recreate my problem, open a new file in Word 2010, use Insert > Picture to insert an encapsulated postscript graphic such as ” ht2_fixbin.eps”, which you can google or find at (You can simply paste that link into the insert dialogue.) Now create two PDFs, using the PDF Maker and print to PDF Print Driver respectively. On my system, the Print version is perfect: the text is text and the blobs are perfect circles; whereas the Maker version is very messed up: the text has become some jagged shapes, the blobs are likewise and the line thicknesses have increased. I am using Microsoft Word Version: 14.0.6106.5005 (32-bit) and Adobe Acrobat X Version 10.1.0.534 on a machine running Windows 7 64-bit.
![And And](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/4c/Acrobat_Pro_CC_icon.svg/1200px-Acrobat_Pro_CC_icon.svg.png)
Adobe Acrobat Pro Student
I would be very grateful for any suggestions that might help me to deal with this. Many thanks, Murray. I, too, have found that PDF Maker (Acrobat X 10.1.3) plugged in to Word 2010 gives odd results compared to simply printing to the Adobe PDF printer driver.
Specifically, I have a header with two words on two lines (company name), but with very tight linespacing to bring them close together. They also have several of Word’s text special effects applied (Gradient Fill-blue, Accent-1, Outline-white, Shadow). PDFs generated by the PDF Maker plug-in put both these words about 3″ to 4″ down on the page — far below where they should be in the header!
Outputting through PDF printer driver preserves their correct location. Adobe can you look into this discrepancy, and hopefully fix it?
I have been using Adobe Acrobat 5 with Publisher 2007 since 07 without any problems. Recently I installed Adobe Acrobat 9 and now I can’t save a PDF in CMYK (a requirement by the graphic artist for printing purposes). I can only save the PDF in RGB. As a result I am going to have to go over my entire newsletter publication and re-make all the ads and standard headings where AA9 has issues. The problem can be something as small as rejecting a white font in a caption, to rejecting a font created as a jpeg that I have been using for many years.
It seems that these things won’t embed. If I buy Microsoft Publisher 2010, will AA9 be more compatible with Publisher? If not, is there another way around this other than having to rebuild my entire newsletter? The from and to are an important part of an email archive. As far as I know, Acrobat has always converted them in the PDF.
You don’t need to actually extract the PDF from the Portfolio. You can open it from the portfolio, redact the words you want, and save it back to the portfolio. If you know all the strings you want to search for, you can use the Search and Redact feature to mark all found words in all the documents in a PDF portfolio. To do so, put the Portfolio in a folder and use that folder as the Source. You can then use an Action to Apply Redactions using the same folder as the source.
PDF-ing a file in Powerpoint 2010 ‘with transparency objects’ produces different result on Adobe PDF Makers and the PDF Print Driver? Adobe PDF Makers output is the same as the source file in powerpoint. PDF Print Driver produces grainy or fine lines in the output of the transparency objects of the source file.
![Office 2010 And Adobe Acrobat 10 Pro Office 2010 And Adobe Acrobat 10 Pro](http://i1-win.softpedia-static.com/screenshots/Adobe-Acrobat_3.png)
”Output from the PDF Print Driver is not functionally equivalent to that of the Adobe PDF Makers.” Is that the above the reason why I am getting the grainy result print on PDF using the PDF Print Driver? Or is there any setting I need to set to achieve the same result on the PDF Print Driver?
![Acrobat Acrobat](https://blogsimages.adobe.com/acrolaw/files/2011/06/007_choose_in_app.png)
Pls advise, thanks.
Attention, Internet Explorer User Announcement: VMware Communities has discontinued support for Internet Explorer 7 and below. In order to provide the best platform for continued innovation, VMware Communities no longer supports Internet Explorer 7. VMware Communities will not function with this version of Internet Explorer. Please consider upgrading to Internet Explorer 8, 9, or 10, or trying another browser such as Firefox, Safari, or Google Chrome. (Please remember to honor your company's IT policies before installing new software!) • • • •.